Ben (Rays GM)
General Manager
Commissioner Emeritus
Ben
Posts: 6,470
|
Post by Ben (Rays GM) on Jan 15, 2011 18:01:25 GMT -5
There has been a change to the compensation system. Brian and I agree that the old rule of having to offer a player 100% of his previous year's salary in order to receive compensation made it too difficult. New rule: You will receive compensation when losing a Type A free agent who played for your team the previous year as long as you offered a contract with a raw annual value of at least 50% of his previous year's salary but failed to sign the player. If anyone offers a player a contract with a raw annual value of 75% of his previous year's salary, then the team that the player played for the previous year will receive compensation regardless of whether that team made an offer that was higher than 50% of his previous year's salary, assuming they don't re-sign the player. You will only receive compensation for Type A free agents. Compensation will take the form of a pick in the compensation round between rounds 1 and 2 of the amateur draft. The draft order of the compensation round will be determined by Elias ranking, with higher ranked players first. Official Elias rankings are not released, so we will use Eddie Bajek's reverse-engineered rankings, which can be found here for the '10-'11 offseason: www.mlbtraderumors.com/2010/10/2009-10-elias-rankings.htmlThere might be a few minor discrepancies between Bajek's rankings and the true Elias rankings, but since we don't have the official rankings, Bajek's rankings will have final say even when we know they disagree with the official ones.
|
|
|
Post by padresgm on Jan 17, 2011 21:42:59 GMT -5
Why don't teams receive the other team's top draft pick? My reasoning is that the only hindrance to signing a free agent is money and cap space. If you received the other team's draft pick, you really have to think when you bid on free agents, whether this player is worth your top draft pick to you.
|
|
angels
Prospect
GM Savvy
Posts: 787
|
Post by angels on Jan 17, 2011 21:45:10 GMT -5
Few reasons right off the bat why that wouldn't work is not every team has a top pick and it also means teams could only go after one type a free agent
|
|
|
Post by padresgm on Jan 17, 2011 22:21:53 GMT -5
Last thing: 11/13 of the free agents have reached 100% of their 2010 contracts already. I don't think that number is unreasonable though I don't have any qualms with the 75% either. Just something to think about.
|
|